refactoring for implicit creation of dependend hosting-assets #108
27
README.md
27
README.md
@ -550,12 +550,37 @@ Dependency versions can be automatically upgraded to the latest available versio
|
||||
gw useLatestVersions
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Afterwards, `gw check` is automatically started.
|
||||
Afterward, `gw check` is automatically started.
|
||||
Please only commit+push to master if the check run shows no errors.
|
||||
|
||||
More infos, e.g. on blacklists see on the [project's website](https://github.com/patrikerdes/gradle-use-latest-versions-plugin).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Biggest Flaws in our Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### The RBAC System is too Complicated
|
||||
|
||||
Now, where we have a better experience with what we really need from the RBAC system, we have learned
|
||||
that and creates too many (grant- and role-) rows and too even tables which could be avoided completely.
|
||||
|
||||
The basic idea is always to always have a fixed set of ordered role-types which apply for all DB-tables under RBAC,
|
||||
e.g. OWNER>ADMIN>AGENT\[>PROXY?\]>TENENT>REFERRER.
|
||||
Grants between these for the same DB-row would be implicit by order comparision.
|
||||
This way we would get rid of all explicit grants within the same DB-row
|
||||
and would not need the `rbac.role` table anymore.
|
||||
We would also reduce the depth of the expensive recursive CTE-query.
|
||||
|
||||
This has to be explored further.
|
||||
For now, we just keep it in mind and
|
||||
|
||||
### The Mapper is Error-Prone
|
||||
|
||||
Where `org.modelmapper.ModelMapper` reduces bloat-code a lot and has some nice features about recursive data-structure mappings,
|
||||
it often causes strange errors which are hard to fix.
|
||||
E.g. the uuid of the target main object is often taken from an uuid of a sub-subject.
|
||||
(For now, use `StrictMapper` to avoid this, for the case it happens.)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## How To ...
|
||||
|
||||
### How to Configure .pgpass for the Default PostgreSQL Database?
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user